Showing posts with label Berita Dunia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Berita Dunia. Show all posts

Bintang Yang 20 Kali Lebih Besar dari Matahari

Bintang Yang 20 Kali Lebih Besar dari Matahari

SubhanAllah,,, telah ditemukan Bintang yang lebih besar 20x lipat dari matahari,  ini merupakan hasil dari penelitian Badan Antariksa Amerika Serikat (NASA),Peneliti NASA, Stefan Kraus dan astronom dari Universitas Michigan, Ann Arbo.

Seperti dikutip di laman resmi NASA, Rabu 14 Juli 2010, Kraus mengungkapkan bahwa Teleskop Luar Angkasa milik NASA, Spitzer, berhasil merekam gambar suatu bintang yang dinamakan IRAS 13481-6124. Gambar dari Teleskop Spitzer itu juga didukung oleh pantauan dari stasiun teleskop di Chile.

Bintang itu berlokasi di konstelasi Centaurus, yang berjarak 10.000 tahun cahaya. Massa IRAS 20 kali lebih besar dari matahari. "Ini merupakan kali pertama benda seperti itu bisa terpantau," kata Kraus.
Semoga dengan penemuan ini menjadikan iman kita semakin tebal kepada Tuhan YME. Sekian Terimakasih

Paul Si Gurita ditawar RP 515 Juta

 Paul Si Gurita ditawar RP 515 Juta


Rekorbaru tercipta, Seorang pengusaha asal Spanyol siap membeli Paul Si Gurita, yang meramal kesebelasan Spanyol akan menjadi juara dunia dan terbukti benar, dengan harga 38.000 poundsterling atau sekitar Rp 515 juta.

Di Piala Dunia 2010 Afrika Selatan, Paul meramal tujuh pertandingan kesebelasan nasional Jerman dan laga final antara Spanyol dan Belanda. Tak satu pun ramalan itu meleset. Itu menjadikan Paul sangat terkenal dan layaknya orang terkenal, selain banyak yang menggemarinya, tak sedikit yang ingin menghabisinya, terutama orang-orang yang tim kesayangannya gagal juara.

Seperti diberitakan Telegraph, pengusaha itu menilai Paul berjasa kepada Spanyol dan ingin menjadikannya maskot acara-acara kuliner di Spanyol.

Perdana Menteri Spanyol, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, bahkan sampai berniat mengirimkan pasukan khusus untuk menjaga Paul, yang berhabitat di Akuarium Oberhausen. "Saya khawatir dengan gurita itu. Saya berpikir mengirimkan tim pengawal untuknya," kata Zapatero

Selain itu, Menteri Lingkungan dan Perikanan Spanyol, Elena Espinosa juga berniat mengajukan undang-undang perlindungan Paul dalam pertemuan menteri-menteri Eropa.

"Saya akan menghadiri pertemuan menteri Eropa dan akan mengajukan larangan menangkap Paul Si Gurita supaya orang-orang Jerman tak memakannya," ungkap Espinosa.
waduch rekor besar tuh bayangkan seekor gurita yang biasa dijual tidak sampai 1juta bisa laku 515 juta wuich... mantab bener...(CyberNews)

Anti-government protesters march in Somali capital

Anti-government demonstrators, including women dressed in full hijabs brandishing AK-47 automatic rifles, marched through the streets of Somalia's violence-torn capital Monday.
The marchers shouted slogans and carried English-language signs accusing the African Union Mission in Somalia, or AMISOM, a peacekeeping military force backing the government, of killing people.
"AMISOM killed my mummy" and "AMISOM get out of our country" said two of the signs against the African peacekeepers.
The protest followed a pro-government rally last Friday and recent clashes between hard-line Islamists and government forces that have killed dozens of people.
Somalia has not had a stable government since 1991, and today, Islamic militant groups are waging war against the government in an effort to implement a stricter form of Islamic law, or sharia.
Somali President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed leads the weak U.N.-backed Transitional Federal Government, or TFG, that is battling al Shabaab, a fundamentalist Islamic group aligned with al Qaeda.
Ahmed was once a senior moderate figure in the Union of Islamic Courts, an alliance that included al Shabaab and held power in Somalia for six months in 2006 before being overthrown by Ethiopian forces.
The Ethiopians remained until early 2009, when the TFG took tentative control, clinging to a small part of Mogadishu, the capital, and protected by African Union peacekeepers mainly from Uganda and Burundi.
Al Shabaab has reached out to Somalis living in the West, radicalizing young Muslims via the Internet and encouraging them to move back to the country to join the jihad. It controls much of central and southern Somalia and large parts of Mogadishu.
The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees estimates that more than 200,000 Somalis have been forced to flee their homes this year, with most remaining within the country's borders because of heavily guarded checkpoints and difficulties in accessing transportation out.[CNN]

Israel confirms easing of Gaza blockade

Israel has confirmed details of what goods it will allow to enter the Gaza Strip with the easing of its blockade.
Consumer goods are being allowed but a "blacklist" of items including weapons and materials that could have a military use will be barred or limited.
Hamas, which controls Gaza, dismissed the concessions as of no use and said the blockade should be fully lifted.
Israel says its blockade of the Palestinian territory is needed to prevent the supply of weapons to Hamas.
Israel came under international pressure to ease its four-year blockade of Gaza after nine Turkish activists were killed in a 31 May Israeli raid on a flotilla that was trying to carry aid to the Palestinian territory
The international Middle East envoy, Tony Blair, told the BBC he believed the international outcry which followed that raid persuaded it to accelerate the easing of the Gaza blockade.
"It is true to say that the Israeli government, I think, were moving towards a different policy anyway, but of course what happened has hugely accelerated the idea," he said.
'Worthless'
Under the new measures, materials such as steel, cement, certain fertilisers and chemicals will be allowed in for Palestinian Authority-approved projects that are under the supervision and for the use of the UN or other international agencies.
Aid agencies say building materials are badly needed in Gaza as the blockade has prevented much reconstruction taking place since Israel's devastating 22-day military offensive, which ended in January 2009.
The blacklist includes so-called "dual-use" items that could be used to manufacture weapons and explosives, such as ball bearings and fireworks.
Meanwhile, exports are not permitted, making it hard for the enclave's devastated economy to pick up, says the BBC's Jon Donnison in Gaza.
The sea blockade will remain and, most importantly for many Gazans, the restrictions on the movement of people remain. It is extremely difficult for Palestinians to get Israeli permission to leave Gaza.
Under its old rules, Israel allowed only a few dozen types of products, including basic food and medicine, into Gaza. Now everything will be permitted freely into the territory, except for items on the blacklist.
Mr Blair said: "These changes are significant and, once implemented, should have a dramatic influence on the daily lives of the people of Gaza and on the private sector."
But a Hamas spokesman, Sami Abu Zuhri, told the Associated Press news agency that the new policy was "worthless", adding: "The problem is not to approve new merchandise but to lift the blockade."
Our correspondent says the timing of the announcement is key, coming as it does on the eve of a visit by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the US to meet President Barack Obama.
Israel tightened the blockade on Gaza in 2007 when the militant group Hamas seized control.
The aim of the blockade was to weaken Hamas, end rocket attacks from Gaza and get back captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.
The restrictions have been widely described as collective punishment of the population of Gaza, resulting in a humanitarian crisis.
Turkish threat
Turkey has for the first time threatened to break diplomatic ties with Israel over its raid on a Gaza-bound aid flotilla.
Turkey's foreign minister said a break could only be averted if Israel either apologised or accepted the outcome of an international inquiry into the raid.
The Israeli government said it had nothing to apologise for.
Ankara curtailed diplomatic relations with Israel after the naval raid.
Turkey - which until recently was Israel's most important Muslim ally - withdrew its ambassador and demanded that the Israelis issue an apology, agree to a United Nations inquiry and compensate the victims' families.

Vuvuzela South African symbol made in China

China's football team did not make it to the World Cup this year, but that does not mean the country's presence has not been felt: The Asian giant has cornered the market on perhaps the most unforgettable off-field aspect of the World Cup -- the vuvuzela.
Ninety percent of the vuvuzelas, the plastic South African trumpet whose loud rasp has become synonymous with the 2010 World Cup, are made in China, according to the China Daily.
The Chinese did it the same way they have done for so many other products: low costs and quick production at factories like the one run by Wu Yuye just outside the southern Chinese city of Ningbo. With a few dozen staff, they make more than 20,000 bugles a day. So far this year, they have churned out more than 1 million of them.
"I'm very proud that our vuvuzelas made it to World Cup in South Africa, especially since we have such a small family factory," Wu said.
And she is not alone. A recent poll in the state media found that more than 60 percent of respondents were proud the "made in China" vuvuzelas were so popular in South Africa.
Making the trumpets is simple: plastic is melted into a mold and then it sets. A small group of women take off the sharp edges to finish off the process.
Wu said it costs about US$0.40 to make each vuvuzela. But outside the stadiums in Johannesburg, the vuvuzelas can sell for up to $8. Despite the markup, not much is coming back to the Chinese manufacturers. Wu said she makes just a few cents on each one.
"Although we don't make a lot of money, I'm sure we'll have a good future making these," she said.
That's because Wu and all the vuvuzela makers in China are looking beyond the World Cup. Domestic orders are starting to come in, including for the Asian Games in Guangzhou later this year. Wu is hoping that the vuvuzela will be the next must have accessory for all sports fans -- maybe the next giant foam finger -- at events like baseball, basketball or rugby.
While a lot of debate has centered on the loud and droning noise of the vuvuzela, Wu has the tact of a business person who knows where the sales are.
"The vuvuzela is a tradition in South Africa, it makes a happy sound," she said.

Israel Action

International condemnation poured in Monday after Israeli soldiers stormed a flotilla of ships carrying aid intended for Palestinians in Gaza, leaving at least 10 people dead in the resulting violence.

Israel claimed it was defending itself, with the Israel Defense Forces saying the soldiers' lives were in danger after they were attacked with "severe physical violence, including live fire, weapons, knives and clubs."

IDF spokeswoman Lt. Col. Avital Leibowitz said light weapons and handguns were confiscated. "We basically encountered a lynch," she said. "We had to control this violence."

But other nations condemned the military action and called for an investigation.

White House spokesman Bill Burton said the United States "deeply regrets the loss of life and injuries sustained and is currently working to understand the circumstances surrounding this tragedy."

World reaction

The Spanish and French governments called the action "disproportionate." The Italian foreign minister asked the European Union to investigate, and several nations, including Greece and Sweden, were summoning their Israeli ambassadors.

An indignant Turkey recalled its ambassador from Israel, canceled three planned military exercises with the Israeli military and called home its youth national football team, which had two games scheduled in Israel, said Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arinc.

Q&A: What is the blockade about

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was in Chile, but will return after meeting with the Chilean president, Arinc said. The chief of the Turkish military was cutting short a trip to Egypt. The Turkish foreign minister, in Venezuela, was calling the United Nations Security Council to an emergency meeting, Arinc said.

"This operation will leave a bloody stain on the history of humanity," Arinc said. A Turkish group, the Humanitarian Relief Foundation or IHH, was one of the organizers of the flotilla, but people from various nations were aboard.

In a statement, Bahrain called it a "barbaric attack" on the part of Israel.

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, an envoy for the Middle East Quartet, a group of nations working toward peace in the region, said in a statement Monday: "There obviously has to be a full investigation into what has happened. Once again I repeat my view that we need a different and better way of helping the people of Gaza and avoiding the hardship and tragedy that is inherent in the present situation."

Current Foreign Minister William Hague said: "We have consistently advised against attempting to access Gaza in this way, because of the risks involved. But at the same time, there is a clear need for Israel to act with restraint and in line with international obligations."

Five Israeli soldiers were wounded, the military said. The ships of the flotilla were being taken to the Israeli port of Ashdod, according to IDF.

The Free Gaza Movement, one of the groups sponsoring the flotilla, disputed Israel's claim of violence by people aboard the ships.

"At about 4:30 am, Israeli commandos dropped from a helicopter onto deck of Turkish ship, immediately opened fire on unarmed civilians," said a post on the group's Twitter page.

Video aired on CNN sister network CNN Turk showed soldiers abseiling onto the deck of a ship from a helicopter above. The boarding of the ships took place more than 70 nautical miles outside Israeli territorial waters, according to IHH.

The Turkish foreign ministry said the incident "might cause irreversible consequences" in the nation's relationship with Israel.

"Israel has once again clearly demonstrated that it does not value human lives and peaceful initiatives through targeting innocent civilians," the statement said. "We strongly condemn these inhuman acts of Israel."

Meanwhile, a protest that began outside the Israeli embassy in Istanbul on Sunday continued into Monday. Although largely peaceful, police did use water cannons at one point to keep demonstrators at bay. Israel issued a "serious travel warning" for Israelis visiting Turkey. Those planning to travel to Turkey were asked to postpone their trip, while those in Turkey were advised to stay indoors.

The Israeli PM office has issues a serious travel warning for Israeli travelers visiting Turkey. The warning calls Israelis who are about to travel into Turkey to postpone their trip and for Israelis in Turkey to remain indoors and avoid presence in the city centers.

In Gaza, where the flotilla was headed, Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri called for global support of the Palestinian cause.

"The Israeli attack on the Freedom Flotilla is an ugly crime and against international law and this reflects the nature of the criminal Israeli occupation," Zuhri said. "We call upon the free world Arab and Muslim world to stand in support and help and support the international activists who have been subjected to killing in the middle of the sea."

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas called for three days of mourning in the Palestinian territories to honor the lives lost.

Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev accused the leaders of the flotilla of looking for a fight.

"They wanted to make a political statement. They wanted violence," according to Regev, who said Israel wanted a peaceful interception of the ships trying to break Israel's blockade of Gaza. "They are directly responsible for the violence and the deaths that occurred."

The convoy of boats approached Gaza in defiance of an Israeli blockade and had been shadowed by three Israeli warships. Free Gaza had reported Sunday that they had been contacted by the Israeli navy.

The boats left European ports in a consolidated protest organized by two pro-Palestinian groups to deliver tons of food and other aid to Gaza to break a blockade imposed by Israel in 2007.

The maritime convoys were organized by both the Free Gaza Movement and the IHH, a humanitarian relief foundation affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood religious group.

Israel said Sunday that Western and Turkish authorities have accused IHH of having "working relations" with different terrorist organizations.
Source : http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/05/31/gaza.protest/index.html?hpt=T1

NASA Gunakan Situs Web GPS untuk Memprediksi Tsunami


NASA Gunakan Situs Web GPS untuk Memprediksi Tsunami


Peneliti NASA telah berhasil menyelesaikan demonstrasi pertama dari sebuah sistem prediksi tsunami prototipe. Dengan menggunakan data real-time global dan regional dari ratusan situs GPS, sistem  ini dapat dengan cepat menilai gempa bumi secara akurat dalam memprediksi ukuran yang dihasilkan tsunami.

Sistem baru, dikembangkan oleh Song Tony Y. dan rekan-rekannya di NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, menggunakan data GPS dari NASA's Global Differential GPS (GDGPS) dan informasi tentang lereng benua (di mana dasar laut turun dari tepi benua ke laut bawah) untuk memperkirakan energi ditransfer ke laut oleh gempa bumi bawah laut. Setelah gempa berkekuatan 8,8 di Chili pada tanggal 27 Februari 2010, tim Song berhasil meramalkan ukuran tsunami yang dihasilkan. Hanya beberapa menit setelah gempa terjadi, jaringan data GDGPS ditangkap gerakan tanah dan menyampaikan ke Song, memungkinkan dia untuk menghitung gerakan dasar laut dan akurat peringkat sumber energi tsunami sebagai moderat (4,8 pada skala sistem 10-point).

gelombang Tsunami yang paling sering ditimbulkan oleh gempa bumi bawah laut besar (lebih besar dari besarnya 7 pada skala Richter) yang merupakan akibat dari pergerakan lempeng samudera dan benua. Ketika piring kelautan padat slide di bawah pelat kontinental ringan, dasar laut bergerak secara vertikal, yang cepat memungkinkan transfer energi dari bumi ke laut. Karena setiap gempa yang unik, menunjukkan panjang gelombang yang berbeda setiap tsunami, ketinggian gelombang, dan directionality - peramalan tsunami membuat tugas yang menakutkan.

sistem peringatan tsunami tradisional telah mengandalkan pada perkiraan lokasi gempa bumi itu, kedalaman, dan besarnya untuk menentukan apakah tsunami besar akan terjadi. Namun sejarah telah menunjukkan bahwa magnitudo tidak selalu merupakan indikator yang dapat diandalkan ukuran tsunami. Gempa bumi Samudra Hindia 2004 menghasilkan tsunami besar, sedangkan 2005 Indonesia gempa tidak, meskipun keduanya memiliki besaran yang sama.

Song mengatakan sistem baru menunjukkan bahwa sistem GPS pesisir secara efektif dapat memprediksi ukuran tsunami, yang dapat mengurangi kesalahan laporan yang mengganggu kehidupan warga pesisir. alarm palsu yang berulang-ulang juga dapat mengarah pada puas diri di antara penduduk pesisir, yang dapat menurunkan respon masyarakat untuk peringatan di masa depan.

Menurut Kelautan dan Atmosfer Nasional Administrasi, sejak tahun 1850 tsunami menyebabkan kerugian lebih dari 420.000 nyawa dan miliaran dolar di seluruh dunia properti kerusakan.

Lagu Waka Waka Tembus Rp 1 Triliun

Lagu Waka Waka Tembus Rp 1 Triliun




Tidak sia-sia Shakira membuat lagu untuk theme song putaran final piala dunia 2010 di Afrika Selatan (Afsel). Pasalnya. Lagu berjudul “Waka-Waka” (This Time for Africa) sangat sukses dalam hal bisnis dan ketenaran.

Di sisi bisnis, baik dari penjualan album maupun ring back tone, di Afsel saja sudah menembus pendapatan lebih dari Rp 1 triliun, bahkan jika dihitung secara teliti, mungkin prodpek bisnisnya bisa lebih dari itu.

Tidak hanya dari sisi bisnis, ketenaran juga menjadi keniscayaan. Sepanjang bulan ini, Waka Waka mampu bertengger di posisi puncak tangga lagu terpopuler di Afsel. Padahal Shakira baru merilis resmi pada bulan Mei.

Total statistik yang berhasil dibuat Waka Waka dalam dua pekan terakhir adalah diputar sebanyak 518 kali di 30 radio dan enam stasiun televisi di Afsel.

Waka Waka sukses mengalahkan Rise Up Mzansi, yang digawangi artis-artis lokal yang tergabung dalam SABC1 All Stars, dengan catatan 303 kali tampil.

Di posisi ketiga asa Kick It Up dari Don Clarke dengan 209 kalo. Sementara theme song piala dunia 2010 yang dinyanyikan K’Naan, Wavin Flag, hanya diputar 142 kali.

Selain keempat lagu tadi, nyanyian bertema piala dunia yang cukup populer adalah Sign of Victory (Robert Kelly, 43 kali)n +h Africa (Akon and Keri Hilson, 36) dan Jabulani 2010 (15).

Anti-Blogger Rhetoric

A Sign of What the Blogosphere Is Doing Right

Consider this study in contrasts: During his first White House news conference last year, President Obama called on a liberal blogger, Nico Pitney, and CNN recently hired conservative blogger Erick Erickson to provide on-air commentary. On the other hand, despite such inroads, "bloggers" in general have increasingly become scapegoats and bogeymen for the mainstream press and politicians.

For example, while praising print media last year, Obama juxtaposed the traditional media with the New Media by voicing reservations about the ethics of blogging: "I am concerned that if the direction of the news is all blogosphere, all opinions, with no serious fact-checking, no serious attempts to put stories in context, that what you will end up getting is people shouting at each other across the void but not a lot of mutual understanding," he said.
Could it be that the president (who until recently was thought to be tech-savvy) is not happy with the online criticism he has received? Perhaps any modern-day president, regardless of party, would be unnerved by the power of the nascent New Media -- and of citizen journalists -- to gin up dissent.

To be sure, the anti-blogger demagoguery is bipartisan. The "just a blogger" trope has been used by Democratic and Republican politicians to discredit unflattering stories that originated in the blogosphere.

While defending South Carolina gubernatorial candidate Nikki Haley from accusations she had an affair with a prominent South Carolina blogger, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said: "Nikki categorically denies the accusation that was spewed out there by a political blogger who has the gall to throw the stone, but then quickly duck and hide and proclaim he would not comment further on the issue. Quite convenient."

It's no surprise that Palin would defend Haley -- she recently endorsed her. And I have no idea whether the allegations are true or fabricated. What caught my attention was Palin's use of the term "political blogger" as a pejorative -- as if that, in itself, discredits the critic.

This seems to be a trend with Palin, who now mocks bloggers with regularit
This seems to be a trend with Palin, who now mocks bloggers with regularity. During an interview on Fox News, she criticized the media for taking cues from "some blogger probably sitting there in their parents' basement, wearing their pajamas, blogging some kind of gossip or -- or a lie."

She ought to know better. The "pajamas" reference was famously employed as a dismissive insult against conservatives by former CBS News executive Jonathan Klein, who ridiculed bloggers questioning Dan Rather's bogus Air National Guard memos, saying: "You couldn't have a starker contrast between the multiple layers of check and balances [at '60 Minutes'] and a guy sitting in his living room in his pajamas writing."

In that instance, the mainstream media finally did take their cues from bloggers, and in so doing finally got the story right. The blogosphere was hardly intimidated. Out of that episode grew a conservative online outlet, Pajamas Media, run by Roger L. Simon, and Klein himself is now president of CNN, which recently hired Erickson to provide commentary.

On yet another occasion, Palin referenced "bored, anonymous, pathetic bloggers who lie to annoy me."

In fairness to the former vice presidential candidate, she has every right to be angry with some bloggers. She and her family have endured scurrilous attacks, including one from a liberal blogger who "broke" the bogus story of her divorce. Worse yet, right after her nomination as John McCain's running mate, Andrew Sullivan of The Atlantic invented a new type of "birtherism" when he went on a bizarre and misguided quest to prove Trig was not really Palin's baby. Sullivan went so far as to demand a paternity test.

On the other hand, it was blogger Adam Brickley (my former intern) who began the "Draft Sarah Palin" blog -- and was widely credited with helping to bring her, then an obscure governor from a distant state, to the attention of the McCain campaign. One could argue that Palin owes her fame to a blogger.

According to Maegan Carberry, who has been both a mainstream reporter at the Chicago Tribune and a blogger at Huffington Post, part of the problem is a failure to distinguish between the different types of bloggers: "Are we talking about the Josh Marshalls or Erick Ericksons? Are we talking about the Chris Cillizzas? Are we talking about the proverbial kid in PJs in his parent's basement?" she asks. "I appreciate the need to establish a trusted brand, which is harder for individuals than decades-old institutions."

Ultimately, bloggers must establish their own credibility if they are to be trusted. As such, they have an incentive to strive for accuracy. But should the accurate and honorable ones face constant criticism that should rightly be aimed at the irresponsible ones?

Clearly, Palin has been both attacked and supported by bloggers. As such, one would hope that she wouldn't paint with a broad brush. Instead, she and others seem to relish going after bloggers the way Spiro Agnew enjoyed blasting the "nattering nabobs of negativism."

But it's not just the politicians who are guilty of this. Mainstream journalists have increasingly gotten into the act, as well. On MSNBC's "Hardball" recently, Howard Fineman said he believes Rand Paul's now infamous Civil Rights Act gaffe had "something to do with the Internet age and the blogging age," adding that there are "a lot of blasting position papers out there. It's a lot of saying, 'I feel great because I've made this statement.' But the fact is, nobody's cross-examining you" about that statement.

Aside from the fact that Paul's comments had nothing to do with blogging, Fineman (who works for Newsweek, which is in danger of going out of business) clearly thinks bloggers just spew opinions without any accountability to readers. For better or worse (and trust me, I could do without some of the comments people leave on my blogs), online writers and bloggers are much more accountable to readers than was the case in the supposedly halcyon days of traditional journalism. It is a mistake to yearn for a time when the only hope a reader had of responding to a "serious" journalist was submitting a letter to the editor and hoping it got published.

As Tim Fernholz, staff writer at the American Prospect magazine, explains: "Many public figures, especially those in the older generation, confused the medium and the message, equating anyone who publishes solely on the Internet with the craziest people who publish solely on the internet. It's as if someone read the Weekly World News and then criticized the New York Times for also being printed on paper -- two totally different products, but ignorance leads to broad brushes."

Other bloggers see the media criticism of bloggers as sour grapes. "At least with newspapers, magazines and TV, they had producers and editors they could count on to keep the blemishes covered," says Andrew Griffin, an Oklahoma-based conservative blogger who was a reporter for various outlets, including a Gannett newspaper in Louisiana. "But now, bloggers and online journalists -- the responsible ones, anyway -- are covering the hard news stories that the Big Paper editors ignore or don't have time for. We have broken stories at my two websites that to this day have been ignored by the local Big Paper and the lapdog TV stations."

In recent weeks, Bill Clinton voiced concern over anti-government rhetoric, and Rand Paul voiced concern over anti-BP rhetoric, yet nobody -- not even the bloggers themselves -- seems terribly concerned about all the anti-blogger rhetoric. As the Erickson, who runs the popular conservative blog RedState, told me, "Bloggers have always been under rhetorical attack. It's no different from people attacking the media in general -- everyone paints with a broad brush. It comes with the territory."

This all makes me wonder if, ultimately, the "blogger" brand will be destroyed. Will bloggers be forced to find a new name for what they do -- just as many liberals now insist on calling themselves "progressives"? Is blogger the new lawyer? Will we have to say, "No, Buffy, I'm not a blogger. I'm an online opinion journalist!"?

Of course, bloggers have no union reps to defend them, and there is no Blogger Anti-defamation League or watchdog group to turn to. And because many political bloggers are more loyal to their ideology than to their profession (or avocation), bloggers rarely defend others of their kind. Case in point: When CNN hired Erickson, the liberal blogosphere went nuts. And when Jane Hamsher, founder of the progressive blog FiredDog Lake defended Erickson as an "honest broker," the left turned on her, too. More recently, conservative bloggers ravaged Will Folks, the blogger who alleged had an affair with Nikki Haley.

Still, some actually see these attacks as a positive sign. "Criticisms of a blogger's credibility further justify their entrenchment in our country's conversation, because once you become a scapegoat in the news cycle it means influential people are paying attention," Maegan Carberry told me. "If something isn't credible or relevant, high-profile figures would not acknowledge it at all."

Chuck DeFeo, CEO of Campaign Solutions, a top online strategy firm (and formerly my boss at Townhall.com), agrees: "As bloggers have expanded their audience and their influence, their ability to impact public opinion has become as strong as some in the mainstream media. With that influence comes the likelihood that some in power not only won't like what you have to say but, more importantly, they now need to respond."

Of course, not everyone would say the attacks are a form of flattery. What is clear, though, is that the hostility toward bloggers isn't merely relegated to politics. Just the other day, Yahoo! CEO Carol Bartz publicly told a tech blogger to "f--- off." Those words are not unusual for a blogger to hear, mind you, but what is unusual is for someone to say it while on stage. And it's not a convincing argument.


Source : http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/05/30/anti-blogger-rhetoric-a-sign-of-what-the-blogosphere-is-doing-r/


Next Update Post Indonesia Furniture Handicraft Wholesale Marketplace

Chinese premier says leaders on Korean peninsula must push for peace

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao said Sunday that Northeast Asia -- which includes the Korean Peninsula -- must push for peace and avoid violent clashes in the aftermath of the sinking of a South Korean warship, state news reported.

"We must promote peace and stability in the Northeast Asian region through every effort," Wen said, according to South Korea's Yonhap news agency. "We should be considerate of each other on a grave issue, deal reasonably with a sensitive matter and strengthen political trust."

His comments to reporters came after two days of meetings with South Korean President Lee Myung-bak and Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama on the South Korean island of Jeju.

The summit came amid mounting regional tension, but was scheduled before the release of a report accusing North Korea of firing a torpedo that sank the Cheonan warship, killing 46 sailors.

Why are the two Koreas so hostile?

Lee has said that his government planned to bring the issue before the U.N. Security Council. But any attempts to seek penalties against North Korea there would need the cooperation of China -- which has veto power on the council.

North Korea has denied the South Korean report's claims. And China, long North Korea's main international supporter, has steered clear of publicly taking sides on the issue.

See CNN's coverage of North Korea

Wen did not mention North Korea directly in his remarks Sunday, Yonhap reported, despite political pressure from South Korea to take a stand.

And during talks with Lee in Seoul, South Korea, on Friday, he said that China had not decided whether to accept the results of South Korea's investigation into the ship's sinking, South Korean officials said.

During Sunday's press briefing, according to Yonhap, Hatoyama said the leaders shared a common view that the Cheonan's sinking was a "serious issue related with Northeast Asia's peace and stability."

Lee said Sunday that he had agreed with Wen and Hatoyama to "cope appropriately with the matter and continue consultations to maintain regional peace and stability," Yonhap said.

The leaders discussed a wide of regional economic and political issues during the two-day summit, including trade and nuclear disarmament.

"We share the view that denuclearized Korean Peninsula would greatly contribute to enduring peace, security and economic prosperity in Northeast Asia," they said in a joint statement.

Source : http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/05/30/south.korea.trilateral.meeting/index.html

Next Update Post Indonesia Furniture Handicraft Wholesale Marketplace

Asteroid probe 'on home straight'

Asteroid probe 'on home straight'
Hayabusa achieved the second and largest of four engine firings designed to guide the probe back home.
The probe visited the asteroid Itokawa in 2005, making close approaches designed to capture soil samples.
But the mission has been plagued by technical glitches affecting the engines and communications with Earth.
It remains unclear whether the probe managed to grab material from Itokawa; scientists will have to open the capsule to find out.
At the weekend, the Japanese Space Agency (Jaxa) announced that Hayabusa had successfully completed its second Trajectory Correction Manoeuvre (TCM), guiding the spacecraft to Earth's "outer rim".
The craft is now roughly 7,600,000km from our planet, according to Jaxa.
The spacecraft is scheduled to return to Earth on 13 June.
At a distance of 40,000km from Earth, the Hayabusa "mothership" will release its sample return capsule.
Shielding should protect the capsule from the high temperatures it will experience during re-entry. Parachutes will then deploy to slow the capsule's speed for its touchdown in the Australian outback.
It is due to land at the Woomera Test Facility in South Australia at around 1400 GMT.
Scientists will be on tenterhooks as they wait for the capsule to be opened.
Even if Hayabusa failed to grab large samples at Itokawa, the capsule may still contain some residues from the asteroid which could be analysed in laboratories.
Hayabusa probably failed to collect large samples from the asteroid
Researchers have already been able to study remote sensing data sent back to Earth by the spacecraft during its encounter with the asteroid.
Hayabusa - which means "Falcon" in Japanese - was launched from the Kagoshima Space Center in Japan on 9 May 2003.
It arrived at Itokawa in September 2005, returning astonishing images of the potato-shaped asteroid's jagged terrain.
Hayabusa made two "touchdowns" designed to collect rocks and soil for return to Earth. But it apparently failed to fire a metal bullet designed to gather the samples.
Asteroids contain primordial material left over from the formation of the Solar System billions of years ago.
A fuel leak in 2005 left Hayabusa's chemical propellant tanks empty, so engineers had to use the spacecraft's ion engines to guide the spacecraft home.
Ion thrusters are highly efficient but have a low acceleration. This means that each trajectory correction takes much longer to complete than it would with chemical engines.























Source : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10196807.stm


NYPD bomb squad tick

Staring down a smoking homemade bomb and dismantling it is dangerous enough. Doing it with news cameras rolling on a busy Saturday night in the middle of Times Square is something Det. Patrick LaScala of the New York Police Department swears never entered his mind.

Until the following day.

"You're home the next day, and you're really thinking about it. Then, you start to put the pieces together and you think, 'Wow,' " LaScala said in an exclusive interview.

LaScala was manipulating the police robot that laid the groundwork for one of his partners, Det. Raymond Clair.

"This was the first time that I went down on a vehicle, and I saw clocks and wires and gas and propane. I identified it as a bomb, and I had to look twice," Clair said.

After 13 years as a bomb tech, that night was the one Clair says he'll remember the most.

Clair and LaScala are part of New York's elite bomb squad, a unit whose size is a closely guarded secret.

CNN was given special access to the unit in order to find out what a more typical day can be like.

During one recent 16-hour shift, I watched the same five-man team who worked the bungled bomb plot in Times Square check their equipment, catch up on paperwork and make sure Dan-O, their explosives-sniffing dog, was raring to go. The K-9 is named for a member of the squad who died in the 9/11 attacks when one of the twin towers collapsed.

On a busy side street outside their Manhattan offices, neighbors watched them go through their paces with the robot.

"We think they're great," one man said.

Another passerby snapped a picture of the robot with her cell phone.

"Is that the robot that checks out bombs?" she asked. It was.

But robots, as sophisticated as they are, can only do so much. They're capable of blowing out windows, blasting a suspicious package to bits, photographing an object from several angles and sending those images to investigators. The squad doesn't want to publicize more specific details. Still, a human touch often can't be avoided.

With help, bomb techs first crawl into an 85-pound protective suit that covers their bodies from head to toe.

The feet nearly look like those of a platypus, the material is stiff and hot, and the chest plate is heavy. A helmet is cinched on around the neck, and an air hose keeps outside air flowing into the mask. Put on gloves, and it's hard to imagine that anyone in such bulky gear could maneuver and dismantle possible bomb components. But that's what they're trained to do.

"The more you do, and the more you get involved, the better you'll get when it's the real thing," Clair said.

Det. Greg Abbate also was there for the "real thing" in Times Square. He said his training kicked in.

"There's a strong bond between us. We go to a job, there's very little talk. Everyone knows what they have to do," he said.

Despite the immense dangers associated with the work, whenever the unit checks out a suspicious package, bomb technicians jockey for the opportunity to suit up.

"We actually have arguments over who's taking the job," added Abbate.

When CNN traveled with them on a call, it was Abbate's turn to wear the gear.

The bomb squad was called to check out a backpack found in a park near a police headquarters checkpoint.

The team sped to the scene with sirens screaming. Other units ringed the perimeter. X-rays were taken. Abbate moved in. This time, he determined that this time, there was nothing to it.

Sgt. John Ryan said it's necessary to assume the worst until the team moves in.

"Everything is a bomb until we say it's not a bomb, " said Ryan.

The days are long, but the men say they feel "blessed" to be part of the bomb squad. They laugh when people suggest they must be a little crazy to do such a dangerous job.

"It's an honor," LaScala said.

And it never gets old.

"At the end of the day, it's just one day down and a lot more to go," said Det. Mike Garcia.

Source  :http://edition.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/05/31/new.york.bomb.squad/index.html?hpt=C2

gulf oil spill top kill

Obama visits beach threatened by Gulf oil spill


Criticism of Obama is rising as crude continues to gush out of the leak weeks after the oil rig exploded and sank. Amid fears that the tragedy crippling the Gulf region's wildlife and economy could soon also engulf his presidency, Obama has launched a campaign to step up public engagement and directly confront the public's anger.

A day earlier, he held a rare White House news conference to address the matter, saying "I take responsibility" for handling what is now considered the biggest oil spill in US. history.

On Friday, he interrupted a Memorial Day weekend stay with his family at their Chicago home for the Gulf visit, with his first stop a beach where absorbent booms and sandbags have been laid to try to keep more oil from washing ashore.

No oil could be seen in the water during Obama's helicopter ride from New Orleans, over Louisiana bayous, to Port Four chon.

That changed when he arrived at Four chon Beach, however.

A shirt-sleeved Obama walked to the water's edge, stooping as Adm. Thad Allen of the Coast Guard explained what he was seeing.

The beach, sealed off with crime-scene-style yellow tape, is one of the few sandy stretches on Louisiana's coast, where most is marshland. Obama called reporters traveling with him to the water's edge to point out some small tar balls.

"These are the tar balls that they're talking about," he said. "You can actually send out teams to pick up as they wash on shore."

From here, the president was going to nearby Grand Isle for a formal briefing from Allen, who is overseeing the spill response for the federal government. Obama was being joined there by the governors of Louisiana, Florida and Alabama. He was spending a total of about three hours in the region.

Allen said on CBS' "Early Show" that the cleanup already is enormously difficult. "It's a real, real tough challenge, especially in the remote areas where you have marshlands involved," he said.

The oil rig leased by BP exploded April 20 and later sank, killing 11 people and releasing millions of gallons of crude oil into the Gulf. There is deep frustration along the coast, increasingly felt in the country at large as well, at the inability of BP and the government to stop the massive spillage of oil into the water.

BP PLC is using what is called a "top kill" procedure to try to stop the leak by pumping in heavy mud. If it doesn't work, something BP says will be known within a couple days, Obama's political problems will only compound.

On Thursday, Obama acknowledged his administration could have done a better job on several fronts. They included misjudging the industry's ability to handle a worst-case scenario, not moving sooner to end "cozy and sometimes corrupt" relations between the oil industry and government regulators, and not getting a better estimate on the amount of oil gushing from the broken well.

He spoke in sometimes personal terms about his ownership of the crisis.

"I take responsibility. It is my job to make sure that everything is done to shut this down," Obama said. "This is what I wake up to in the morning, and this is what I go to bed at night thinking about."

He also announced a series of new restrictions on oil drilling projects. And the first political casualty of the spill came Thursday when Elizabeth Birnbaum, the head of the Minerals Management Service that oversees offshore drilling, resigned under pressure.

Locals suffering the effects of the oil that is soiling birds and darkening beaches had mixed feelings about Obama's trip.

"He'll have a better idea of what he needs to do or get other people to do," said Donald Lefort, 41, a convenience store clerk in Venice, La., a staging area for containment efforts.

A frustrated Larry Freman, 72, who was cleaning up around his vacation home on Grand Isle's main drag, usually packed with tourists for the holiday, said Obama should stay home.

"He's wasting his time," the oil business veteran said.

source: newser

Ads on NYC buses target those wanting to leave Islam

New York (CNN) -- "Fatwa on your head?" a new series of provocative ads on New York City buses asks. "Is your community or family threatening you? Leaving Islam?"
The ads, sponsored by an organization called Stop the Islamization of America (SIOA), direct viewers to refugefromislam.com, a website designed "for people who are thinking of leaving Islam or are leaving Islam and need resources" to protect them from harm.
Practicing Muslims who find the ads offensive should "ignore it," SIOA leader Pamela Geller told CNN. "It's not directed to them."
Speaking on conservative Sean Hannity's radio show recently, Geller said, "it's time for Americans to stand up against the evil of Islamic jihadi terrorism and Islamic supremacism." The SIOA, which is funded by its online readership, is currently lobbying to block a mosque proposed near the World Trade Center site.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations in New York says the ads are nothing more than "Islam bashing."
"Islamophobes are notorious for their cheap tactics that seek to marginalize American Muslims and divide communities," CAIR Community Affairs director Faiza Ali said in a statement.
"Pamela Geller uses the same tactics as tobacco companies, hiding the cancerous nature of her agenda behind a smokescreen of feigned concern. Geller is free to say what she likes, just as concerned community members are free to critique her tactics and motives," Ali said.
Speaking at a Tennessee "Tea Party" convention earlier this week, Geller called CAIR an "unindicted co-conspirator Muslim-brotherhood front Hamas-tied" organization.
Although the same campaign caused controversy when SIOA bought ad space on public buses in Miami, New York Metropolitan Transit Authority spokesman Aaron Donovan told CNN that no one has asked the MTA to remove the ads yet.
"We have not gotten complaints on it, to be honest," he said. Like most ads seen on MTA subway cars and buses, the campaign will run a month. Last April, Donovan remembered, the MTA ran ads for whyislam.org -- an organization which encourages visitors to explore the Quran and seeks to "challenge popular stereotypes and misconceptions about Islam" -- on the subway system.
All subway and bus ads seen on New York City public transportation are handled by a contractor who vets ads with MTA officials before running them, he said.
Source : http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/05/27/new.york.islam.ads/index.html

Iran Protesters' Twitter Revolution On Display In Paris

An exhibit in Paris brings together some of the thousands of mobile phone videos shot by anti-government protesters after last June's disputed presidential election.
Tehran largely banned international and Iranian media from freely covering the massive wave of protests over alleged fraud in the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad.
But Iranians overcame the reporting ban by using their cell phones and social-networking and image-sharing websites such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.
The Paris exhibit, "Action 1," gives visitors a firsthand look at the demonstrations and the crackdown that seem to have changed the lives of millions of Iranians.
'Solidarity Beyond Imagination'
The exhibit's organizers viewed thousands of Internet videos before making the selection to display in 59 Rivoli, a gallery off Paris' busy rue de Rivoli. The group calls itself the Green Ribbon, after the symbol of Iran's opposition movement. It is made up of Iranians living in France as well as some French artists who came together after last year's election to support Iranian artists.
Orash, one of the Green Ribbon's leaders, came to Paris from Iran a year and a half ago. He doesn't want to give his last name in case he returns — and out of solidarity with the exhibit's anonymous video artists. Orash says last year's demonstrations ended the isolation of millions of Iranians.
"Personally ... I thought that I don't want this regime, but I am the only one. It's no good to shout, it's no good to write, to create. But after these events, I saw that millions and millions of [people] are thinking the same way. So it gave new hope for Iranians all over the world, and it has created a solidarity beyond imagination," Orash says.
Scenes of violence play out on TV screens all over the gallery as black-clad Basiji militia beat people and chase crowds of young people through the streets. French subtitles translate some of the conversation of those filming. "They look just like the Gestapo," says one witness.
Generation Gap
Scottish visitor Stephen Riley said he was seeing the footage for the first time.
"The contrast between the physical arms of the militia and the communication arms of the protesters, which seems to amount to mobile phones and cameras, is quite a striking paradox," Riley says.
Riley came to the exhibit with his friend, a 50-year-old Iranian who calls herself Aryan H., because she also fears giving her last name. Aryan H. has lived in Paris for 20 years. In 1979, she demonstrated to overthrow the shah and bring Ayatollah Khomeini to power. She says many young people still blame her generation for that.
"My generation, we [were] very ashamed, because it was our fault what's happened to them," she says, adding that the latest demonstrations have helped bring the two generations back together.
A Gathering Point
The exhibit has become a gathering point for Paris' Iranian community. Expats converse in Farsi on the sidewalk in front of the gallery.
Giant reproductions of some of the Twitter messages sent during the protests hang in the gallery's tall windows. "It's getting harder to log on to the Net," reads one. "Our phone line was cut and we lost Internet," says another.
The gallery's top floor is pitch dark, except for some tiny electric candles placed around the floor. The room is filled with the sound of people chanting "Allahu akbar," or "God is great," from the rooftops of Tehran.
Another Green Ribbon member, Azam, 27, says this chanting went on every night for more than six months after the June 12 election, turning what was once a mantra of the Islamic revolution into a call for protest. She says the nightly ritual brought people closer.
"They went to the top of their house or behind their window, and they say 'Allahu akbar,' and in front of your house there's another house, and there's someone there who says 'Allahu akbar,' and they know each other after one month. And it's so kind," Azam says.
These young Iranians say they believe it is only a matter of time before the movement that began last summer leads to real change in Iran. 

Source : http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127136155&ft=1&f=1001
Next Update Post Indonesia Furniture Handicraft Wholesale Marketplace

Sudanese president starts new term amid boycott calls

(CNN) -- Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir will be sworn in for a new term Thursday amid an outcry from human rights groups over his international war-crimes indictment.
Al-Bashir won the country's controversial but historic presidential election with roughly two-thirds of the vote, the nation's election commission said.
The elections were the first in 24 years in the oil-rich African nation, which has seen deadly violence in Darfur and a civil war between north and south.
International observers, including the United States, criticized the elections and said there were irregularities in many parts of the country.
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said intimidation and threats were reported in south Sudan. The ongoing conflict in Darfur also made it unfavorable for voting, he said.
International human rights groups have called for a boycott of the inauguration.
Last year, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for al-Bashir over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Darfur.
Hundreds of thousands of people have been killed in the region, one of the world's most desolate, as minority rebels battle the Arab-dominated government.
The incumbent president has defied the arrest warrant, the first ever issued by the ICC for a sitting head of state.
Al-Bashir has traveled to several countries since the warrant was issued, even though any country that is party to the ICC has an obligation to hand him over to The Hague.
New York-based Human Rights Watch said governments committed to justice for Darfur should skip the inauguration. The group decried plans by the United Nations to send a representative to the ceremony.
"U.N. guidelines limit U.N. interaction with individuals indicted by international criminal courts such as President al-Bashir to what is strictly required for carrying out UN mandated activities," Human Rights Watch said in a letter to U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon. "Attendance at the inauguration cannot be justified as strictly required."
The election was a key part of a 2005 peace deal that helped end decades of civil war between the country's north and south -- a different conflict from the one in Darfur.
The south-north conflict pitted Christian and animist southerners against Muslim northerners, leaving more than 2 million people dead. The peace deal also called for a referendum next year to determine whether the south should become an independent nation.
Salva Kiir was elected president of southern Sudan, a semi-autonomous region scheduled to vote next year on whether to become independent.

Source : http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/africa/05/27/sudan.inauguration/index.html?hpt=T1


Next Update Post Indonesia Furniture Handicraft Wholesale Marketplace

Boy, 8, chained up by father and sold on the street

AN EIGHT-year-old boy was chained to a lamppost by his impoverished father and auctioned off to the highest bidder.
Yong Tsui tried to entice passers-by into making an offer with assurances that his son, Fai, was a hard worker, 
However, the auction came to a violent end after onlookers heard bidders asking how little they would have to feed the boy.
Several people attacked Mr Yong, with one putting him in a headlock until the police arrived.
Mr Yong told officers in Wuhan, central China, that his wife had died three years ago and that he could no longer afford to take care of the boy.
"He has no job, no home and no money. He says he wasn't interested in the money, just finding a home for the boy," said police, who have put boy into care.Mr Yong was reportedly inspired to auction his boy after reading about a rickshaw driver who chained his two-year-old son to a lamppost while he went out to work because he couldn't afford childcare.

Pictures of the toddler, Cheng Jingdan, were published around the world and led to nursery giving him a free place.

Child abduction and child slavery is rife in China.

Last week police in Wuhan freed two naked girls who had been locked in a basement for almost a year.

They were rescued after a repairman found a note they had managed to smuggle out in a broken television.


Source : http://www.news.com.au/boy-8-chained-up-by-father-and-sold-on-the-street/story-e6frfkp9-1225871815699


Facebook event will outline 'simpler' privacy controls

After one of the most tumultuous months in its young history, Facebook is about to announce new features intended to offer its hundreds of millions of users simpler privacy choices.

The announcement will come at 10:30 a.m. PDT on Wednesday in the company's Palo Alto, Calif., offices. Facebook says the event will feature CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other executives who will "discuss details regarding enhanced, simpler privacy controls."

The last few weeks have not been kind to the Internet's second most popular Web site, which has been pilloried by privacy activists and slammed by some members of Congress. The flap has spawned interactive graphics showing how Facebook has gradually exposed more user data, third-party tools designed to let Facebook users verify that their privacy settings are accurate, and reports of internal discord among employees.

Though the recent focus on Facebook started with its announcements in late April at the F8 developers conference, which included deeper connections with partner Web sites, the concerns have been building for a long time. There was the outcry over the now-defunct Beacon advertising program, Zuckerberg's remarks last December about pushing users to disclose more, and brief eruptions including last week's disclosure of Facebook sharing some data with advertisers in possible violation of its privacy policy.

CNET will be covering the event live right here, so please bookmark this Web page and join us tomorrow morning.

Facebook privacy announcement
(05/26/2010) 
9:05
[Standby]  We'll be back at 10:30 a.m. PDT. See you then.
10:29
declan: 
So James Martin and I are here at Facebook HQ in Palo Alto, just west of El Camino Real. James will be providing your photographs today; I'll be doing the typing. So far, with two minutes to go, there's your standard milling around. Wait: Mark Z. just showed up at the front wearing a grey hoodie sweatshirt and is chatting with a few reporters.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:29 declan
10:33
declan: 
CEO Mark Zuckerberg is starting. When there's a "good, safe environment they can use," people will share more information, is how he's kicking this off.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:33 declan
10:33
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:33 
10:33
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:33 
10:36
declan: 
Facebook PR is handing out a printout of the text of a blog post from Mark Z. The title is "Making Control Simple." It doesn't seem to be up on Facebook's official blog yet, though.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:36 declan
10:36
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:36 
10:36
Caroline McCarthy: 
I'm dialed into Facebook's conference call from New York and will be helping Declan and James out by providing commentary on what some of the changes mean in the context of Facebook's history and the current controversy.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:36 Caroline McCarthy
10:37
Caroline McCarthy: 
Basically, Zuckerberg's talking about Facebook and how it's changed so much from its inception--in his opinion, the privacy controls HAVE to change.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:37 Caroline McCarthy
10:38
declan: 
Zuckerberg is going into a brief history of the company and Web site, saying that Facebook had "hardly any" features when it launched. The blog post he handed out says there will be three changes: "First, we've built one simple control to set who can see the content you post...Second we've reduced the amount of basic information that must be visible to everyone and we are removing the connections privacy model...Third, we've made it simple to control whether applications and Web sites can access any of your information."
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:38 declan
10:39
Caroline McCarthy: 
Interesting that Zuckerberg mentioned the News Feed very early on. This was one of Facebook's first big privacy scandals: When it first launched in fall 2006, members freaked out.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:39 Caroline McCarthy
10:39
declan: 
More Zuckerberg blog post: "The overhaul of Facebook's privacy model is complete. If you find these changes helpful, then we plan to keep this privacy framework for a long time." That raises the obvious question: How will Facebook judge whether users find the changes "helpful" or not?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:39 declan
10:40
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:40 
10:40
[Comment From JamesEvansJamesEvans: ] 
Is this event available on the web so we can see it?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:40 JamesEvans
10:41
Josh Lowensohn: 
@James, not by Facebook.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:41 Josh Lowensohn
10:42
Caroline McCarthy: 
Here's what happened when Facebook members flipped out over the original News Feed: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-6113700-7.html
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:42 Caroline McCarthy
10:42
declan: 
Zuckerberg is talking about regional networks now. This background seems to be designed to provide a 15-minute quick education dump to reporters who don't specialize in this area. We haven't really reached the news yet.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:42 declan
10:43
[Comment From Larry DignanLarry Dignan: ] 
@declan, you're not kidding. Holy history lesson
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:43 Larry Dignan
10:43
Caroline McCarthy: 
Facebook did away with regional networks about a year ago in conjunction with the launch of some new privacy controls: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10277102-36.html
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:43 Caroline McCarthy
10:44
declan: 
Zuckerberg, the master of understatement, is summarizing the move to friends/friends of friends/everyone current settings: "We don't necessarily think it's safe for you to share your cell phone number with everyone in Turkey." In other words, the limitation of regional networks. We're still not at the news yet, sorry folks.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:44 declan
10:45
[Comment From theharmonyguytheharmonyguy: ] 
Facebook Developers blog post on privacy changes: http://bit.ly/bxVbxT
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:45 theharmonyguy
10:45
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:45 
10:45
Josh Lowensohn: 
Thanks for the link
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:45 Josh Lowensohn
10:47
declan: 
Brief aside: When a small gaggle of other reporters and I were being escorted by Facebook full-time staff (PR folks) through their offices here in Palo Alto to the press conference space, we were barred entry to the room by security for a few minutes. They didn't let us in through the door until a PR person who was on security's "approved" list made an appearance. In other words, Facebook cares quite a bit about its *own* privacy and security...
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:47 declan
10:47
[Comment From jamiewjamiew: ] 
@caro -- how many times you have written a Facebook article with "messed up" in the title?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:47 jamiew
10:47
Caroline McCarthy: 
@jamiew, that was Zuckerberg's direct quote!
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:47 Caroline McCarthy
10:48
declan: 
Zuckerberg: The privacy feedback "really resonated" and we had developers and engineers camped out in a conference room to rework things. And now, we get to the reason for this press conference.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:48 declan
10:49
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:49 
10:49
declan: 
Zuckerberg: There will be one simple control that applies to all content retroactively and applies to new products going forward. If you set your preference to friends-of-friends, for instance, that will continue to be the default going forward.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:49 declan
10:50
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
How will these changes be communicated to facebook users?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:50 Guest
10:51
declan: 
@Guest: There will be a message on the home page, videos on the blog, a new privacy guide added.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:51 declan
10:52
[Comment From steveosteveo: ] 
some account have the new settings already. Rafe showed a bit of it on BOL Live
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:52 steveo
10:52
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:52 
10:52
Caroline McCarthy: 
So far, this focus has been on keeping information private from other people on Facebook, not a focus yet on third-party companies using the API.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:52 Caroline McCarthy
10:53
declan: 
First admission of "there may have been a mistake" by Zuckerberg. He says an update will come to basic directory information too. Some kind of directory is "necessary for people to find you on the site." But there's going to be less publicly available information, and what he's calling real privacy controls (no connections). Waiting for details.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:53 declan
10:54
Caroline McCarthy: 
Zuckerberg has said the word "bucket" at least a half dozen times.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:54 Caroline McCarthy
10:54
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
Any indication why they felt the need to make this such a big reveal?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:54 Guest
10:54
declan: 
@Guest: My guess would be the pressure from politicians and advocacy groups.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:54 declan
10:54
[Comment From brianbrian: ] 
You can see more about the new privacy here: http://www.facebook.com/privacy/explanation.php
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:54 brian
10:55
Caroline McCarthy: 
@Guest, some D.C. lawmakers have taken issue: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-20003717-36.html
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:55 Caroline McCarthy
10:56
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:56 
10:56
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:56 
10:56
declan: 
On Facebook Platform, there will be full opt-out, an "easy" opt out for instant personalization, and a granular permissions model that was already described at F8. Applications will have "dramatically" limited access to your info. Mark Z. is showing a slide demonstrating that it seems reasonably easy to turn off some of these choices.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:56 declan
10:57
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
When do these changes take affect.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:57 Guest
10:57
Caroline McCarthy: 
"Over the next few days or weeks," Zuck says.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:57 Caroline McCarthy
10:57
[Comment From visitorvisitor: ] 
The announcement post is up: http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=391922327130
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:57 visitor
10:57
Caroline McCarthy: 
You can block the Facebook Platform--i.e. all apps--altogether. This is impressive, but pretty extreme and I doubt many members will do it.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:57 Caroline McCarthy
10:57
declan: 
Zuckerberg is done with his prepared remarks and is moving to questions.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:57 declan
10:59
declan: 
Facebook privacy changes by the numbers: From 50 settings required to make all information private to less than 15; It consolidated 10 settings on 3 pages to 7 pages on one page. Privacy center pages drop from 13 to 8.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 10:59 declan
11:00
[Comment From georgeangelogeorgeangelo: ] 
@Declan, don't be sorry for no news yet. Zuckerberg is the one who should be doing all the apologizing.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:00 georgeangelo
11:01
Caroline McCarthy: 
The first question is an interesting one: If Facebook is prone to making these erratic changes, even if it ultimately fixes them, can it still be trusted?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:01 Caroline McCarthy
11:01
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:01 
11:01
[Comment From Christopher BoucherChristopher Boucher: ] 
@Declan Privacy is CHOICE. You have the choice to share what you want, when you want, and how you want it.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:01 Christopher Boucher
11:01
[Comment From Bill McGeveranBill McGeveran: ] 
I've lost count of their supposedly permanent overhauls of privacy settings that supposedly make everything easy. Do you guys have a count? The constant change is half the problem!
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:01 Bill McGeveran
11:02
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
I am wondering if you will be able to change privacy settings for each individual post on your wall. For example, lets say you hide something from a group or groups but later decide you don't care if they see it. You can't change the setting (the little lock) for individual posts.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:02 Guest
11:04
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:04 
11:04
declan: 
Zuckerberg "doesn't mean to diminish privacy concerns at all"--but stresses that more people remain much more worried about Facebook possibly charging money than about privacy. "We've seen no meaningful changes on any of the stats" even after all the Delete-Your-Facebook-Pages campaigns, he says. People are still very inclined to recommend Facebook to friends, he says. Perhaps the personal privacy preferences of liberal advocacy groups and DC politicians don't match with those of the general public.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:04 declan
11:04
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
it looks like they are in affect now according to my privacy settings options
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:04 Guest
11:05
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
So how do they expect to determine whether users find the changes helpful? After all, they were way off thinking everyone wanted more granularity.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:05 Guest
11:05
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
how do i view this news conference?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:05 Guest
11:05
declan: 
@Guest: Facebook isn't making a live stream publicly available.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:05 declan
11:06
[Comment From BrianBrian: ] 
@declan Advocacy of personal concerns is difficult to an organization with limited accessibility (after all, we're not ALL journalists)
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:06 Brian
11:06
[Comment From Jeff MJeff M: ] 
I'll just as likely leave FB it they fail at privacy as if they would begin charging
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:06 Jeff M
11:07
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:07 
11:08
declan: 
Zuckerberg: We've been chatting with advocacy groups, and senators "who had feedback for us." But the "main thing we did" was listen to users and figure out what the "biggest things were" that we needed to do. When you serve 400 million people, there are a lot of different constituencies. But it's a "misperception" to believe that changes are due to advertising.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:08 declan
11:09
[Comment From Tom KrazitTom Krazit: ] 
Would people pay for a completely private Facebook that never did the bait-and-switch thing?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:09 Tom Krazit
11:09
[Comment From greghlgreghl: ] 
a slider is perfect for most people - but some will prefer the more granular approach - such as app developers, advertisers etc,
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:09 greghl
11:09
[Comment From drdr: ] 
From the slide displayed, it looks like Mark is emphasizing the fact that "everything is opt-out." Someone needs to press on this point: in order to maintain security / privacy, everything must be opt-IN.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:09 dr
11:10
declan: 
This event isn't even over, but I'm already getting statements from advocacy groups. Here's one from the Progress and Freedom Foundation, a free-market group that has been telling politicians not to regulate: "By giving users powerful new tools to further protect their privacy, Facebook has employed a potent weapon to deal with
marketplace apprehensions: self-regulation." That was fast.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:10 declan
11:11
[Comment From greghlgreghl: ] 
hey - can we opt out of ads? ;)
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:11 greghl
11:11
declan: 
And here's one from the ACLU of Northern California, which has markedly different views: "Facebook is finally friending privacy again. Facebook's about-face on privacy comes as a result of mounting pressure from users and Washington...While it's true that users have more control than they did yesterday, there are still important steps that must be taken."
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:11 declan
11:11
[Comment From Joe HallJoe Hall: ] 
Yeah, I wish there was more focus on what they're doing that *isn't* about privacy settings... but how this episode has taught them to manage change, both in terms of innovation in their service and pressure to monetize.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:11 Joe Hall
11:12
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
Does facebook plan on allowing administrators of fan pages to see everyone that "likes" that page without being friends?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:12 Guest
11:13
[Comment From greghlgreghl: ] 
lol - do you trust any online company Caroline? Google ?!?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:13 greghl
11:13
declan: 
Zuckerberg: "We're trying to make this system simple by default." And he takes the time to remind reporters that the point of Facebook is, ah, sharing information in the first place. "That's always been a really important part of how the site works."
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:13 declan
11:13
[Comment From Jon PincusJon Pincus: ] 
"less than 15" changes is still a lot to have to make to protect privacy. 1 would be much easier.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:13 Jon Pincus
11:13
[Comment From Jeff ChesterJeff Chester: ] 
Notice that the data collected and used for targeted advertising--including its datamining applications--is still off the table.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:13 Jeff Chester
11:13
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
I appreciate this step, but as someone mentioned earlier, this is a step too late. Much like Google apologizing for stealing information.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:13 Guest
11:14
[Comment From gcluleygcluley: ] 
Why is everything opt-out? Shouldn't it be opt-IN? Or can't Facebook come up with a convincing argument why you'd want to share your info? And if they can't convince us of that..
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:14 gcluley
11:14
Caroline McCarthy: 
@gcluley Yes, while it seems like some privacy groups are satisfied, others still want Facebook to make things opt-in.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:14 Caroline McCarthy
11:15
declan: 
@Caroline: I'm guessing that the comment from Jeff Chester above comes from the Center for Digital Democracy's Jeff Chester, who's been a frequent Facebook critic. Jeff, any other reactions?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:15 declan
11:16
[Comment From georgeangelogeorgeangelo: ] 
If you ask me, Facebook should follow up on MySpace's original slogan of "a place for friends".
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:16 georgeangelo
11:16
[Comment From greghlgreghl: ] 
400 millions customers is surely a big pool of opinions - I doubt they had 0.1% express an opinion - but still - that 0.1% would still represent 10x the number of customers *I* have... that's a lot of people to try and make happy.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:16 greghl
11:16
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
It's opt out because information is how they make their money.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:16 Guest
11:16
Caroline McCarthy: 
Zuckerberg claims that he's been misquoted in instances where it's been implied that he "doesn't care" about privacy and thinks it's a thing of the past. "We really do believe in privacy and we believe in giving people control."
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:16 Caroline McCarthy
11:16
declan: 
Zuckerberg didn't really address a law enforcement access question, saying something about "tension" and then moving on to a different subject.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:16 declan
11:17
[Comment From gcluleygcluley: ] 
Am I reading this right: if you don't want to share with search engines, you need to block applications too? Crumbs..
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:17 gcluley
11:17
[Comment From BrianBrian: ] 
Ads pay for the servers, engineers, etc. that let you and 400 million other users store billions of photos, videos, etc. Since no one wants to pay to use Facebook, I'd love to hear someone tell me how these guys stay in business if not for advertising.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:17 Brian
11:17
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
they make money on devs too
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:17 Guest
11:17
Expand
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:17 
11:18
declan: 
Zuckerberg: When you have 500 million people using your service and only a small number are upset, that could be a larger number of people than who live in the state of New York.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:18 declan
11:18
[Comment From MichaelMichael: ] 
Even in this tool my comments about Facebook being evil are being silenced. CNN + Facebook conspiracy? Truth needs to be heard.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:18 Michael
11:18
[Comment From Jon PincusJon Pincus: ] 
we'll be having a lot of discussion of this, including the opt-in/opt-out debate, at the upcoming Computers, Freedom, and Privacy conference -- it's in San Jose, mid-June, and we'll have folks from Facebook as well as ACLU, EFF, EPIC, CDT, and other privacy organizations. more at http://cfp.acm.org/wordpress/?p=301
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:18 Jon Pincus
11:19
declan: 
@Jon Pincus: Agreed. CFP is worth going to.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:19 declan
11:19
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
This Facebook issue is surely the most insightful thing on America's duality. The same population which tweets about when they last had a burger is asking for more privacy!!!
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:19 Guest
11:19
[Comment From Joe HallJoe Hall: ] 
Yeah, I toyed with an idea of a browser-based extension/plugin that would encrypt plaintext before sending to FaceBook and then decrypt on the client... but then I left FB (and it wasn't easy).
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:19 Joe Hall
11:19
[Comment From Bill McGeveranBill McGeveran: ] 
What's the tone like? Do they sound chastened?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:19 Bill McGeveran
11:20
Caroline McCarthy: 
@Bill McGeveran, I think there's a real tension in Zuckerberg's rhetoric (which I'll be writing about further). On one hand, he says he sees real demand to make privacy settings simpler once again. On the other, there's an undertone of "...but this isn't really what users want, they want to share."
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:20 Caroline McCarthy
11:20
declan: 
@Bill: From being in the room here with Zuckerberg, I'd say the Facebook employees here seem more exuberant than chastened. They seem excited about this. Zuckerberg adds a lesson here is "don't mess with the privacy stuff for a long time!" The audience laughs.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:20 declan
11:20
[Comment From Jeff ChesterJeff Chester: ] 
Thanks. I am reviewing the policy now--and thanks to you, Caroline, CNET for doing this. It appears Mr. Zuckerberg is still in digital denial. The only reason they changed the privacy settings from what they just announced last December is the extraordinary political and advocacy pressure from both sides of the Atlantic. Facebook has steadily worked to undermine privacy, in order to bolster its ad revenues for an IPO. Facebook needs to be an opt-in model, with more granular control.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:20 Jeff Chester
11:21
[Comment From Taylor VincentTaylor Vincent: ] 
@michael - Evil's subjective. Come back with something more specific or constructive and you might get more credit. :P
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:21 Taylor Vincent
11:21
declan: 
An odd shout out to epic.org on the press conference telephone call? No question, just an advertisement. Marc Rotenberg, was that you? :)
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:21 declan
11:21
[Comment From Jeff MeyersJeff Meyers: ] 
Caroline, Zuckerberg is only partially right. Users want to share, but they want to share what they want with the people they want to share it with, not everyone
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:21 Jeff Meyers
11:22
[Comment From greghlgreghl: ] 
lol - yes, they want to share - but they want to share with FRIEND - not anonymous companies - and when they do CHOOSE to share with companies, they want to LIMIT that sharing by default, not explicitly, for every single application or company.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:22 greghl
11:22
[Comment From williamwilliam: ] 
My guess is they don't make their money advertising, or they make some money from advertising, but the make more from data-mining services for companies. That's the explanation for the an 'opt-out' defaults, they're hoping the majority of their users won't and so that information because available to be mined.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:22 william
11:22
[Comment From Jeff MJeff M: ] 
Agreed Brian, you can't have a free service and not have ads or some other way of "using the users" to make money
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:22 Jeff M
11:23
declan: 
Zuckerberg: More than 50 percent of users on Facebook have changed at least one setting. So that disproves the argument, he says, that users blindly keep the defaults. Most people go in and change some things, which means "we're probably in a pretty good place for the defaults."
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:23 declan
11:24
[Comment From Taylor VincentTaylor Vincent: ] 
Yep. Defaulting everything to friends or friends-of-friends is ideal for we that value privacy, but that's not a business model.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:24 Taylor Vincent
11:24
[Comment From greghlgreghl: ] 
facebook ads were not a winner for us - ROI was so low it was a joke. Google adwords just "works" - facebook ads were a huge waste of money for us.... still I hope they work for some...
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:24 greghl
11:25
Caroline McCarthy: 
Zuck takes a moment to pimp David Kirkpatrick's book "The Facebook Effect."
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:25 Caroline McCarthy
11:25
declan: 
Yes, it's show and tell time here at Facebook HQ. Nice glossy cover.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:25 declan
11:25
Caroline McCarthy: 
I assume they didn't invite Jesse Eisenberg.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:25 Caroline McCarthy
11:27
declan: 
When you're 22 and have the opportunity to sell a company for $1 billion, you no longer need to maximize the amount of money you have. This is part of the trust-us argument, but it does make some sense. It's the economic principle of diminishing returns. If you're hungry there's a big difference between 0 apples and 1 apple, but not a big difference between 1,000 apples and 1,001 apples. Or dollars.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:27 declan
11:27
[Comment From lfeldmanlfeldman: ] 
If more than 50 percent of users are changing at least one default, that means that the defaults are unacceptable, not that they're in a "pretty good place."
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:27 lfeldman
11:27
[Comment From Jeff MeyersJeff Meyers: ] 
50% of users probably changed the settings because of chain-postings of their friends warning of privacy concerns...not because they understand the settings. I'm an InfoSec professional and I still have to think through what I'm doing
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:27 Jeff Meyers
11:27
[Comment From Jon PincusJon Pincus: ] 
Caroline, excellent point about the tension. Also, if they really believe that most people want to share, then an opt-in model would work just fine. Yes, it requires a little more effort from those who want to share [as opposed to those who want to protect their privacy] but that seems like a reasonable tradeoff.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:27 Jon Pincus
11:28
declan: 
Mark Z's quote of the day: "We're really going to try not to have another backlash."
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:28 declan
11:28
[Comment From Joe HallJoe Hall: ] 
I guess there was no mention of FTC? (although I'm not sure much has happened on that front, other than back channel talks)
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:28 Joe Hall
11:28
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
So if 50% of people don't change the defaults 200 million people are blindly opted-in...
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:28 Guest
11:29
declan: 
@Joe Hall: There was no explicit mention of the FTC, though Zuckerberg did reference general conversations he had with many different parties, which presumably means the FTC.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:29 declan
11:29
[Comment From nodsternodster: ] 
@declan because they weren't trying before?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:29 nodster
11:29
declan: 
@nodster: Good point...
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:29 declan
11:30
[Comment From b.b.b.b.: ] 
I want out now!!!... did he even mention how!?!
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:30 b.b.
11:30
Josh Lowensohn: 
@b.b. we've got an FAQ on doing that here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20005556-245.html
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:30 Josh Lowensohn
11:30
[Comment From Jeff ChesterJeff Chester: ] 
Despite what is done today by Facebook, we expect that the FTC will soon be addressing social networking privacy.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:30 Jeff Chester
11:30
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
So does turning off instant personalization help? To turn off instant personalization on all partner sites, uncheck the box below. This will prevent these partners from receiving any of your information through instant personalization, even content you have made available to everyone.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:30 Guest
11:30
[Comment From teazmediateazmedia: ] 
"More than 50 percent of users on Facebook have changed at least one setting. So that disproves the argument, he says, that users blindly keep the defaults." What was the most changed setting and what was the momentum of edits after the last opt-out 'everyone' policy change compared to prior to the change?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:30 teazmedia
11:31
declan: 
@teazmedia: It's a good question to ask. I have another one I'd like to pose to Zuckerberg first.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:31 declan
11:31
declan: 
Oh, wait. They're shutting this down. Chris Cox, head of product. Bret Taylor, head of platform, Sheryl Sandberg, are sticking around, but Zuckerberg is leaving.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:31 declan
11:32
Caroline McCarthy: 
I'm signing off now - I'm going to be writing a follow-up piece for CNET. Look for it soon!
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:32 Caroline McCarthy
11:32
declan: 
So the press conference is officially over. Chris Cox, Bret Taylor, and Sheryl Sandberg are in the back of the room for informal chats, Zuckerberg and his grey hoodie have left the room. We'll keep this going for a few more minutes.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:32 declan
11:33
[Comment From Jon PincusJon Pincus: ] 
this was a great discussion, thanks Declan and Caroline -- and James, great pictures too!
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:33 Jon Pincus
11:33
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
Thanks for this great coverage!
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:33 Guest
11:33
[Comment From Joe HallJoe Hall: ] 
would also be interesting if they mentioned tools like reclaimprivacy. anyway, thanks for this Dec and co.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:33 Joe Hall
11:34
declan: 
@Joe, Jon, Guest: You're quite welcome! Check back on CNET News this afternoon for some more analysis.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:34 declan
11:34
[Comment From Joe HallJoe Hall: ] 
someone get that man a wardrobe (he says sitting in his Princeton office in shorts (it is 95F))
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:34 Joe Hall
11:34
[Comment From nodsternodster: ] 
Hope they keep the momentum and pressure on privacy rather than think this solved the problem. I was expecting more.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:34 nodster
11:34
[Comment From nodsternodster: ] 
thanks all!
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:34 nodster
11:35
declan: 
@nodster: Yep, it's not as sweeping an announcement as I had expected, though I admit I need a bit more time to digest it fully.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:35 declan
11:35
[Comment From teazmediateazmedia: ] 
Thx for the coverage and looking forward to the post coverage too.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:35 teazmedia
11:35
[Comment From BaronVonBonkersBaronVonBonkers: ] 
Declan, thanks for the coverage.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:35 BaronVonBonkers
11:35
[Comment From JamesEvansJamesEvans: ] 
so everyone will have the new controls by when?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:35 JamesEvans
11:36
Caroline McCarthy: 
@JamesEvans, Zuckerberg said this will be "over the next few days or weeks."
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:36 Caroline McCarthy
11:36
[Comment From bluesparks42bluesparks42: ] 
@nodster - They're going to do as little as possible to solve the problem. It's going to depend on whether or not users are satisfied as to when this goes away.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:36 bluesparks42
11:36
[Comment From weemundoweemundo: ] 
Great job CNET team :)
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:36 weemundo
11:36
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
If people are so clever to change at least one setting, why fb don't choose opt-in? Like Mark Z. says, people want to share. And if they want, they can switch back
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:36 Guest
11:37
declan: 
@Guest: I think it's because Facebook doesn't have to. I mean, there's no legal requirement that they do, and if 99 percent of users don't seem to mind, there's no business requirement that they do either...
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:37 declan
11:37
declan: 
@Guest: Or perhaps they'd say that by using Facebook, you're opting in already...
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:37 declan
11:37
[Comment From bluesparks42bluesparks42: ] 
Thanks for the coverage, all. Now I'm heading back to twitter. :P
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:37 bluesparks42
11:37
[Comment From Bill McGeveranBill McGeveran: ] 
At first blush it doesn't sound like the substance of the changes justifies the spin.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:37 Bill McGeveran
11:37
[Comment From ivorytowersivorytowers: ] 
Many thanks CNET, excellent live coverage
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:37 ivorytowers
11:38
[Comment From nodsternodster: ] 
@bluesparks42 indeed, I just wish it had solved known problems for educators and other individuals who relied on facebook for its spheres of control. They've simplified control over existing settings without extending the control over new elements such as pages.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:38 nodster
11:39
declan: 
From a political perspective, the question now is: Will this satisfy the members of Congress who have been pressing for changes? And the FTC? I don't think the answer is immediately obvious.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:39 declan
11:39
[Comment From bluesparks42bluesparks42: ] 
@Bill McGeveran - I think perhaps expecations were high going in, hence some of the spin. Time will tell.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:39 bluesparks42
11:39
[Comment From 33: ] 
When will they disable that "identify friends picture" to log back in? I have been locked out of my fb for a half an hour now from traveling.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:39 3
11:39
[Comment From gcluleygcluley: ] 
We "opted-in" to use Facebook a while back. They changed the rules.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:39 gcluley
11:40
declan: 
@gcluley: That's true, of course, and an important point. If Facebook had been more open from the beginning, and that was viewed as the default, we wouldn't be having this conversation today. Expectations are important.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:40 declan
11:40
[Comment From gcluleygcluley: ] 
Thanks CNET for helping us know what was going on at this event. Nice work!
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:40 gcluley
11:40
[Comment From jmkaysjmkays: ] 
@CNET - Thanks for this!
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:40 jmkays
11:40
[Comment From theharmonyguytheharmonyguy: ] 
I'm still not entirely clear if these new settings remove the visibility vs. access dichotomy Facebook had previously established (i.e. connections were public, but you could hide them on your profile)
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:40 theharmonyguy
11:40
[Comment From bluesparks42bluesparks42: ] 
@nodster - There are lots of other options, but nothing as ubiquitious as facebook, and teaching a bunch of middle schoolers to use their facebook login as OpenID to log onto a Wordpress site is too complex for students and educators.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:40 bluesparks42
11:40
Caroline McCarthy: 
@declan @gcluley: I doubt people would have joined Facebook in the first place. The culture in 2004 was far more skeptical about having a presence online.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:40 Caroline McCarthy
11:41
[Comment From JamesEvansJamesEvans: ] 
So today was a lot of nothing, the real news will happen when we all get our hands on the new controls and see what is really private.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:41 JamesEvans
11:41
[Comment From GuestGuest: ] 
99% of users might just not be aware of how their information is shared.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:41 Guest
11:41
[Comment From bluesparks42bluesparks42: ] 
@Caroline McCarthy But does that then justify Zuckerberg's statement that privacy expectations are changing?
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:41 bluesparks42
11:41
Caroline McCarthy: 
@bluesparks42: I think he's right, that they have changed. This was a situation where they may have made too fast of a move forward.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:41 Caroline McCarthy
11:41
declan: 
@bluesparks42: I think privacy expectations are changing, and the core of Zuckerberg's statement is correct. But whether he's right about how *fast* they're changing is a different story.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:41 declan
11:41
Caroline McCarthy: 
@declan JINX
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:41 Caroline McCarthy
11:41
[Comment From seabrightseabright: ] 
I just dont trust facebook anymore. Think I am quitting. They are making these changes but what is to say that they wont change again in the future.
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:41 seabright
11:43
declan: 
Okay, folks, time to shut this down. Thanks for joining us. Check out some details about the privacy announcement here: http://www.facebook.com/privacy/explanation.php And visit news.com later this afternoon for a post-game analysis!
Wednesday May 26, 2010 11:43 declan
11:43



















 
 
 
                                                                                
 Source : http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20005976-38.html